Pages

Google's driverless car now can be seen in Nevada


The Google car that can drive on it own is now eligible to ride on the streets of American State Nevada.
Technically speaking, what this means is that the car - yes, the car itself - has been issued its own driver license. In other words, the state of Nevada feels the inner workings of Google's smart vehicle contain the same capacity of driving ability and human judgment as any physical person sitting behind the wheel.
The car in question is a Prius, and has been loaded with a very special software package originally designed by Google for use in and around the company's headquarters in Mountain View, California.

But it is in Nevada where Google has been spending most of its time with the contraption as of late, since that's the state that it has been able to sweet talk into actually making it legal to take on the streets.
The software within the car uses all sorts of tools, ranging from a set of short-range radar sensors and video cameras to a persistent Internet connection that constantly scans Google Maps for road and traffic updates.
While obviously it is still a highly focused and experimental project, it could be the beginning of a ripple effect on the entire automotive industry.
Of course, Google hasn't really put the car through its full paces just yet. When it goes for a test drive, the car always has trained employees inside, who are able to override the autopilot mechanism at a moment's notice.
Interestingly enough, though, the only time that the driverless car has been in an accident is when it was being driven in manual override mode. It has never shown any safety problems when in its driverless state.

Facebook bought social location application Glancee after Instagram


Facebook has made its second major acquisition this year after buying social location application Glancee.
The app - dubbed a 'friendly stalking' application - locates nearby Facebook (and, as of now, Twitter) users with similar interests to be your 'friends', located via their phones. 
Along with its purchase of Instagram for $1 billion, it's an indication that Facebook is keen to beef up its expertise in mobile technology - both apps are focused on phones and tablets, rather than desktop PCs.
Glancee Aplication

For an undisclosed sum Facebook, took ownership of all of Glancee’s technology and its staff in its latest attempt to crack location based services.
Glancee quietly tracks users’ locations and suggests people nearby who have similar interests by comparing their profiles on Twitter and Facebook.
It is different from Foursquare because users do not have to check in and works in the background until it finds a good match nearby.
Users can then ask to become ‘favourites’ with people they would like to know, a process that has been dubbed ‘friendly stalking’.
Glancee generated a significant amount of buzz at the SXSW festival this year and appears to have impresed Facebook more than Highlight, a similar location sharing app.
The difference with Highlight is that it shows the exact location of other users on a map, whereas Glancee just tells you they are nearby.
Experts said that the sale was not another Instagram which had 35million users and was a potential threat to Facebook.
Facebook Logo

Glanceee only has been downloaded 30,000 times and 20,000 users using it in the background on their iPhone.
But Facebook is keen to make it a success after its similar ‘Places’ app failed miserably.
It also bought Gowalla, which again carried out a similar function - but shut it down months later.
Facebook’s move was greeted with some scepticism on some technology websites and writing on Venturebeat Jolie O'Dell said it was bad for Glancee users.
She said: ‘Unfortunately for the app’s users, this was a talent grab.
‘It looks like Facebook is shutting Glancee down; users are being offered the chance to download their data, and the app has been yanked from the App Store and Google Play’s Android apps section’.
In a statement Facebook said it was ‘thrilled’ to acquire Glancee.

'Tweets in Space' plans sending Twitter messages to habitable planet


Twitter users across the world may be able to find followers 22 light-years away - thanks to 'Tweets in Space', an ultramodern project that hopes to transmit 140-character texts to a potentially habitable planet this fall. During a live performance set for September 21 at the Albuquerque Balloon Museum, collaborators Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern plan to beam tweets carrying the hashtag #tweetsinspace all the way to GJ667Cc, New York Daily News reported.
Scientists have asserted that the recently discovered planet in other star  has the potential to support some form of life.

'We look at it from the standpoint of democratizing deep space transmissions,' Kildall said.
'All tweets sent during the performance, whether you're at the event or at home on your computer, will be transmitted.'
'We thought it would be worthwhile to show the sea change in how information is broadcast in our culture.'
 Kildall and Stern hope to send out their interplanetary Twitter feed via a high-powered radio transmitter. They hope to pay for the gear with donations they collect through the fundraising website rockethub.com.
 Thus far, they have amassed almost 1,600 dollars of the 8,500 dollars they insist they will need to beam the messages a distance of five light-years.
 There hope is that five light years is far enough into space for any ET's on GJ667Cc who might be tuning in to pick up the signal.

'We're making some assumptions about their listening technology,' Stern said.

'We're assuming a similar intelligence to our own can pick out patterns,' Stern added.

Garlic can acts as stronger antibiotics for food-borne illness


Researchers have isolated a compound in garlic that is a 100 times more potent than popular antibiotics in combating Campylobacter bacteria, one of the commonest causes of intestinal illness. Some 2.4 million Americans alone are affected by Campylobacter every year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with symptoms including diarrhoea, cramping, abdominal pain and fever.
Garlic

"This work is very exciting to me because it shows that this compound (diallyl sulphide) has the potential to reduce disease-causing bacteria in the environment and in our food supply," says Xiaonan Lu, postdoctoral researcher at the Washington State University, who led the study.
Lu and colleagues looked at the ability of the garlic compound, diallyl sulphide, to kill the bacteria when it is protected by a slimy biofilm that makes it 1,000 times more resistant to antibiotics, the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy reports.
 They found the compound can easily penetrate the protective biofilm and kill bacterial cells by combining with a sulphur-containing enzyme, changing the enzyme's function and effectively shutting down cell metabolism, according to a Washington statement.
Diallyl Sulphide 


The researchers found that diallyl sulphide was as much as 100 times effective than much of the antibiotics erythromycin and ciprofloxacin and would often work in a fraction of the time.
"This is the first step in developing or thinking about new intervention strategies. Campylobacter is simply the most common bacterial cause of food-borne illness in the United States and probably the world," says Michael Konkel, study co-author who has been researching Campylobacter jejuni for 25 years.
Previously, Lu and colleagues found that diallyl sulphide effectively kills important foodborne pathogens, such as listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Believe it or not the British lab is growing human spare parts, now organ donation is a thing of the past


'This is a nose we’re growing for a patient next month,’ Professor Alexander Seifalian says matter-of-factly, plucking a Petri dish from the bench beside him.
Inside is an utterly lifelike appendage, swimming in red goo. Alongside it is another dish containing an ear. ‘It’s a world first,’ he says smiling.
‘Nobody has ever grown a nose before.’
His lab is little more than a series of worn wooden desktops strewn with beakers, solutions, taps, medical jars, tubing and paperwork, and looks like a school chemistry lab. 
But it’s from here that Seifalian leads University College London’s (UCL) Department of Nanotechnology and Regenerative Medicine, which he jokingly calls the ‘human body parts store’. 
Seifalian showing Nose made from nanomolecules

As he takes me on a tour of his lab I’m bombarded with one medical breakthrough after another. Daily Mail Reporter Said
At one desk he picks up a glass mould that shaped the trachea – windpipe – used in the world’s first synthetic organ transplant. 
At another are the ingredients for the revolutionary nanomaterial at the heart of his creations, and just beyond that is a large machine with a pale, gossamer-thin cable inside that’s pulsing with what looks like a heartbeat. It’s an artery. 
‘We are the first in the world working on this,’ Seifalian says casually to daily mail reporter. ‘We can make a metre every 20 seconds if we need to.’
‘Other groups have tried to tackle nose replacement with implants but we’ve found they don’t last,’ says Adelola Oseni, one of Seifalian’s team.
‘They migrate, the shape of the nose changes. But our one will hold itself completely, as it’s an entire nose shape made out of polymer.’
Looking like very thin Latex rubber, the polymer is made up of billions of molecules, each measuring just over one nanometre (a billionth of a metre), or 40,000 times smaller than the width of a human hair. Working at molecular level allows the material itself to be intricately detailed. 
Ear made in lab 

‘Inside this nanomaterial are thousands of small holes,’ says Seifalian.
‘Tissue grows into these and becomes part of it. It becomes the same as a nose and will even feel like one.’
When the nose is transferred to the patient, it doesn’t go directly onto the face but will be placed inside a balloon inserted beneath the skin on their arm. 
After four weeks, during which time skin and blood vessels can grow, the nose can be monitored, then it can be transplanted to the face.
At the cutting edge of modern medicine, Seifalian and his team are focusing on growing replacement organs and body parts to order using a patient’s own cells. There would be no more waiting for donors or complex reconstruction – just a quick swap. 
And because the organ is made from the patient’s own cells, the risk of rejection should, in theory, be eliminated.
Unsurprisingly, the recipe for the breakthrough biocompatible material used is a closely guarded secret. 
From those who have lost noses to cancer to others mutilated by injury, it’s hoped this revolutionary process could transform thousands of lives. 
‘We seed the patient’s own cells on to the polymer inside a bioreactor,’ says Oseni. 
This is a sterile environment mirroring the human body’s temperature, blood and oxygen supply. 
‘As the cells take hold and multiply, so the polymer becomes coated. The same methods could be applied to all parts of the face to reconstruct those of people who have had severe facial traumas.’
 ‘The full success of these implants needs to be tested with a larger number of patients in clinical trials,’ says Seifalian.
Such is the speed of progress that regenerative medicine is now moving on from replacing heart valves and rebuilding faces to potentially curing blindness and accelerating the study of some of the most debilitating diseases. 
The UK is at the forefront of this research, with work on a £54 million MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine in Edinburgh completed earlier this year.
Until recently, regenerative medicine focused mostly on embryonic stem cells as these were the most versatile. They are called pluripotent, meaning they have the ability to become any cell type – blood, muscle, etc. 
By contrast, adult stem cells can replicate themselves endlessly, but only as the cell they began life as – skin cells replicate as skin cells, muscle cells as muscle cells.
But the moral debate surrounding embryonic stem cell research is controversial. 
Stem cells are taken from human embryos, which are destroyed in the process. 
In 2007, Professor Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto University managed to create pluripotent cells from adult stem cells, potentially removing the need for embryonic stem cells completely.
These are known as induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPSCs. He was in part inspired by Professor Ian Wilmut, who was knighted for his role in the creation of Dolly the cloned sheep.
‘In the same way Dolly made us think maybe we could change cells, Yamanaka proved it could be done,’ says Wilmut.
‘This makes you think you can produce any cell type, producing nerves or muscle from skin cells, for example.’
This has been proved recently with the news that scientists at Cambridge Universityhave created brain cells from skin cells which could help with the search for new treatments for Alzheimer’s, stroke and epilepsy.
Sitting on a desk inside Seifalian’s laboratory is the mould for the trachea which he and his team created. It was recently implanted into a patient making it the world’s first ever synthetic organ transplant. 
The patient in question, a 36-year-old Eritrean man, had a large cancerous tumour in his throat that was rapidly spreading towards his lungs. The transplant was successful, and the patient is now out of hospital and recovering well.
On another bench in the lab lies an ear ready for seeding, while next door the team is working on heart valves that won’t even need seeding before implantation, having been developed instead to attract the cells they need once implanted. 
This will allow them to grow in the body instead of bioreactors and, along with an insertion method that removes the need to open the chest, could revolutionise heart bypass surgery.
‘Normally for heart bypass you take a section of vein from the patient’s leg or arm. But 30 per cent of patients don’t have suitable veins so can’t have the operation. No alternative currently exists for them,’ says Seifalian. 
‘We are the first in the world with this. Nobody else is even close. It has been successful in animal trials; this year it will be going for patient trials’.
While Seifalian and his team keep developing potential implants, on the other side of Londonanother team led by Professor Pete Coffey, the London Project to Cure Blindness, is using stem cells to tackle age-related macular degeneration, the most common form of age-related sight loss, which affects 513,000 people in the UKalone. 
‘There’s nothing that can be done for those with the disease,’ says Coffey. ‘There’s a real unmet need here.’
The aim is to replace the diseased cells with healthy new ones, restoring vision. 
Unlike Seifalian’s team, Coffey’s is using embryonic stem cells because in every experiment to date they are the only ones that work.
On the issue of working with embryonic stem cells Coffey is clear.
‘One thing I always face is that the term embryo has a different meaning for different people.
'The embryo in this case is five days old, and I know under various religious definitions that’s life, but I see this as similar to organ donation. That embryo cannot survive on its own.’
Most embryonic cells used in research, including Coffey’s, are from IVF treatment where a large surplus of embryos is part of the process. Unwanted embryos can be donated to research, otherwise, as Coffey says, ‘they’re disposed of.’
 ‘A human embryonic cell keeps reproducing itself naturally, so one cell generates everything we need – we’ve banked the duplicates in nitrogen chambers in three different countries – which means this cell could service a clinical population of 28 million. Isn’t that worth it?’
Coffey’s project is perhaps the most advanced major regenerative medicine project in the world today, scheduled for clinical trials with patients later this year. But even success in a patient trial is no guarantee a treatment will ever reach the mass market.
‘The sad thing is the time frame here,’ says Paul Whiting, executive director of Pfizer’s regenerative medicine arm, who is working closely with Coffey’s project. 
‘Even things that seem close are probably ten years away, while many are 20 to 50 years away. We need to know if these things will do long-term harm before they can reach patients, so it will be a gradual progression over at least 50 years.’
And a recent study illustrates just how far the divide between laboratory success and clinical reality could be: researchers at California University have found that mice treated with iPSCs made from their own skin cells ultimately reject the transplants.
When asked about this, Wilmut agrees it was valid but also says it was ‘a very preliminary observation’, another piece of the puzzle leading toward full understanding of the subject. There are also concerns that the reprogramming process used to create iPSCs might cause cancer in those same cells.
But back in Seifalian’s labs, the raw energy remains. 
‘Before, the idea was you rob Peter to pay Paul, taking one bit of the body to reconstruct another, but now the idea of being able to grow tissues in a lab and to reconstruct the body is huge,’  says Adelola Oseni.
‘If we can grow a heart, a lung or a trachea in a lab, we don’t need to wait for donors. 
'This work has massive implications for the way we function as clinicians and the way medicine is practised.’
Source : Daily Mail 



Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More